| Citation: |
Xueting Wu, Lingling Li, Jing Pan, Xiao Wang, Huabin Zhang, et al. CeO2 Modified Ni-MOF as an Efficient Catalyst for Electrocatalytic Urea Oxidation. Materials Lab 2022, 1, 220009. doi: 10.54227/mlab.20220009
|
CeO2 Modified Ni-MOF as an Efficient Catalyst for Electrocatalytic Urea Oxidation
-
Abstract
The development of cost-efficient electrocatalysts for urea oxidation reaction (UOR) is a challenge due to the slow kinetics. In this work, we demonstrated a one-pot hydrothermal synthetic method to fabricate CeO2 modified Ni-MOF nanosheets (NSs). When evaluted as UOR catalysts, the 3% CeO2/Ni-MOF possesses outstanding catalytic activity, achieving the current density of 10 mA cm−2 at a low potential of 1.356 V with a small Tafel slope of 13.83 mV dec−1. It is considered that the unique interactions between CeO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and Ni-MOF NSs play the significant role in the enhancement of the catalytic performance by inducing the formation of abundant defects and optimized surface states.
-
Keywords:
- CeO2 /
- electrocatalyst /
- Ni-MOFs /
- hybrid /
- UOR
-
-
References
1. X. J. Zhu, X. Y. Dou, J. Dai, X. D. An, Y. Q. Guo, L. D. Zhang, S. Tao, J. Y. Zhao, W. S. Chu, X. C. Zeng, C. Z. Wu, Y. Xie, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 12465 2. Y. B. Li, C. Zhong, J. Liu, X. Q. Zeng, S. X. Qu, X. Han, Y. P. Deng, W. B. Hu, J. Lu, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30, 1703657 3. N. Senthilkumar, G. G. Kumar, A. Manthiram, Adv. Energy. Mater., 2018, 8, 1702207 4. J. Y. Zhang, T. He, M. Wang, R. Qi, Y. Yan, Z. Dong, H. Liu, H. Wang, B. Y. Xia, Nano Energy, 2019, 60, 894 5. S. J. Yao, S. K. Wolfson, B. K. Ahn, C. C. Liu, Nature, 1973, 241, 471 6. Z. L. Wang, W. J. Liu, Y. M. Hu, M. L. Guan, L. Xu, H. P. Li, J. Bao, H. M. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 272, 118959 7. H. C. A. Sun, W. Zhang, J. G. Li, Z. S. Li, X. Ao, K. H. Xue, K. K. Ostrikov, J. Tang, C. D. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 284, 119740 8. N. Wu, R. H. Guo, X. Zhang, N. Gao, X. Y. Chi, D. L. Cao, T. P. Hu, J. Alloys Compd., 2021, 870, 159408 9. L. P. Wang, Y. J. Zhu, Y. Z. Wen, S. Y. Li, C. Y. Cui, F. L. Ni, Y. X. Liu, H. P. Lin, Y. Y. Li, H. S. Peng, B. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 10577 10. H. Jiang, M. Sun, S. Wu, B. Huang, C. S. Lee, W. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2104951 11. L. Xia, Y. Liao, Y. Qing, H. Xu, Z. Gao, W. Li, Y. Wu, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2020, 3, 2996 12. B. Zhu, Z. Liang, R. Zou, Small, 2020, 16, 1906133 13. S. Chen, J. J. Duan, A. Vasileff, S. Z. Qiao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 3804 14. X. Zhang, Y. Y. Liu, Q. Z. Xiong, G. Q. Liu, C. J. Zhao, G. Z. Wang, Y. X. Zhang, H. M. Zhang, H. J. Zhao, Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 254, 44 15. Z. W. Seh, J. Kibsgaard, C. F. Dickens, I. B. Chorkendorff, J. K. Norskov, T. F. Jaramillo, Science, 2017, 355, eaad4998 16. M. P. Browne, Z. Sofer, M. Pumera, Energy Environ. Sci., 2019, 12, 41 17. H. Liu, S. Zhu, Z. Cui, Z. Li, S. Wu, Y. Liang, Nanoscale, 2021, 13, 1759 18. G. Yang, Y. Jiao, H. Yan, C. Tian, H. Fu, Small Struct., 2021, 2, 2100095 19. J. Xie, L. Gao, S. Cao, W. Liu, F. Lei, P. Hao, X. Xia, B. Tang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 13577 20. D. D. Zhu, C. X. Guo, J. L. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Dub, S. Z. Qiao, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 10906 21. J. F. Xie, W. W. Liu, F. C. Lei, X. D. Zhang, H. C. Qu, L. Gao, P. Hao, B. Tang, Y. Xie, Chem. Eur. J., 2018, 24, 18408 22. L. Wang, L. Ren, X. Wang, X. Feng, J. Zhou, B. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 2018, 10, 4750 23. L. S. Zhang, L. P. Wang, H. P. Lin, Y. X. Liu, J. Y. Ye, Y. Z. Wen, A. Chen, L. Wang, F. L. Ni, Z. Y. Zhou, S. G. Sun, Y. Y. Li, B. Zhang, H. S. Peng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 16820 24. D. A. Daramola, D. Singh, G. G. Botte, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2010, 114, 11513 25. F. P. Cheng, Z. J. Li, L. Wang, B. Yang, J. G. Lu, L. C. Lei, T. Y. Ma, Y. Hou, Mater. Horiz., 2021, 8, 556 26. F. L. Li, P. T. Wang, X. Q. Huang, D. J. Young, H. F. Wang, P. Braunstein, J. P. Lang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 7051 27. K. Rui, G. Zhao, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, Q. Zhou, J. Chen, J. Zhu, W. Sun, W. Huang, S. X. Dou, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1801554 28. Y. Tong, P. Z. Chen, M. X. Zhang, T. P. Zhou, L. D. Zhang, W. S. Chu, C. Z. Wu, Y. Xie, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 1 29. F. L. Li, Q. Shao, X. Huang, J. P. Lang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 1888 30. T. Y. Kou, S. W. Wang, J. L. Hauser, M. P. Chen, S. R. J. Oliver, Y. F. Ye, J. H. Guo, Y. Li, ACS Energy Lett., 2019, 4, 622 31. W. C. Records, Y. Yoon, J. F. Ohmura, N. Chanut, A. M. Belcher, Nano Energy, 2019, 58, 167 32. X. L. Chen, X. Zhong, B. W. Yuan, S. Q. Li, Y. B. Gu, Q. Q. Zhang, G. L. Zhuang, X. N. Li, S. W. Deng, J. G. Wang, Green Chem., 2019, 21, 578 33. Y. Zhai, X. Ren, J. Yan, S. Liu, Small Struct., 2021, 2, 2000096 34. L. N. Sha, K. Ye, G. Wang, J. Q. Shao, K. Zhu, K. Cheng, J. Yan, G. L. Wang, D. X. Cao, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 359, 1652 35. H. Xu, Z.-X. Shi, Y.-X. Tong, G.-R. Li, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30, 1703657 36. G. L. Lu, H. Y. Zheng, J. J. Lv, G. Wang, X. B. Huang, J. Power Sources, 2020, 480, 229091 37. Y. Liu, C. Ma, Q. Zhang, W. Wang, P. Pan, L. Gu, D. Xu, J. Bao, Z. Dai, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1900062 38. D. D. Zhao, Y. C. Pi, Q. Shao, Y. G. Feng, Y. Zhang, X. Q. Huang, ACS Nano, 2018, 12, 6245 39. J. Yu, Q. Cao, Y. Li, X. Long, S. Yang, J. K. Clark, M. Nakabayashi, N. Shibata, J. J. Delaunay, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 1605 40. X. J. Feng, Y. L. Shi, Y. S. Wang, S. X. Min, Z. A. Hu, Chin. J. Appl. Chem., 2011, 28, 302 41. D. Y. Liu, N. W. Yang, Q. Zeng, H. Liu, D. Chen, P. L. Cui, L. Xu, C. Q. Hu, J. Yang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2021, 32, 3288 42. J. H. Kim, K. Shin, K. Kawashima, D. H. Youn, J. Lin, T. E. Hong, Y. Liu, B. R. Wygant, J. Wang, G. Henkelman, C. B. Mullins, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 4257 43. W. Gao, Z. Xia, F. Cao, J. C. Ho, Z. Jiang, Y. Qu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1870071 44. L. L. Zhang, J. Pan, Y. Long, J. Li, W. Li, S. Y. Song, Z. Shi, H. J. Zhang, Small, 2019, 15, 1903182 45. L. N. Sha, J. L. Yin, K. Ye, G. Wang, K. Zhu, K. Cheng, J. Yan, G. L. Wang, D. X. Cao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 9078 46. J. P. Li, G. B. Zhao, H. Y. Zhao, N. N. Zhao, L. L. Lu, N. L. Liu, M. Wang, C. J. Ma, Q. Zhang, Y. P. Du, Nanoscale, 2021, 13, 3581 47. G. Ma, Q. Xue, J. Y. Zhu, X. Y. Zhang, X. Wang, H. C. Yao, G. F. Zhou, Y. Chen, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 265, 118567 48. Z. Li, M. Shao, L. Zhou, R. Zhang, C. Zhang, M. Wei, D. G. Evans, X. Duan, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28, 2337 49. G. Chakraborty, I. H. Park, R. Medishetty, J. J. Vittal, Chem. Rev., 2021, 121, 3751 50. S. Dang, Q. L. Zhu, Q. Xu, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2018, 3, 17075 51. T. V. M. Sreekanth, G. R. Dillip, P. C. Nagajyothi, K. Yoo, J. Kim, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 285, 119793 -
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
-
Supplementary Information
Supporting_Information-MATLAB-2022-0009.R1 
Figures(4)
Information
Article Metrics
Export File
Citation
Xueting Wu, Lingling Li, Jing Pan, Xiao Wang, Huabin Zhang, et al. CeO2 Modified Ni-MOF as an Efficient Catalyst for Electrocatalytic Urea Oxidation. Materials Lab 2022, 1, 220009. doi: 10.54227/mlab.20220009
Format
Content
DownLoad:
-
Figure 1.
(a) Schematic illustration of the formation of CeO2/Ni-MOF. (b, c) SEM images, (d, e) TEM images, (f) HRTEM image and (g) elemental mapping images of 3% CeO2/Ni-MOF.
-
Figure 2.
(a) XRD patterns and (b) FT-IR spectra of different catalysts. (c) XPS Ni 2p spectra of Ni-MOF and 3% CeO2/Ni-MOF. (d) XPS Ce 3d spectra of 3% CeO2/Ni-MOF.
-
Figure 3.
(a) LSV curves of 3% CeO2/Ni-MOF in 1 M KOH electrolyte with and without 0.33 M urea. (b) LSV curves of CeO2 NPs, Ni-MOF, 1% CeO2/Ni-MOF, 3% CeO2/Ni-MOF and 5% CeO2/Ni-MOF in 1 M KOH electrolyte with 0.33 M urea. (c) Tafel plots, (d) potentials at 10 mA cm−2, (e) mass activity at η = 1.356 V, (f) TOF at η = 1.356 V, (g) current density differences at 0.25 V plotted against scan rate in a non-Faradaic and (h) Nyquist plots recorded at 0.483 V of Ni-MOF, 1% CeO2/Ni-MOF, 3% CeO2/Ni-MOF and 5% CeO2/Ni-MOF. (i) Chronopotentiometry curves of 3% CeO2/Ni-MOF at 10 mA cm−2.
-
Figure 4.
XRD patterns of 3% CeO2/Ni-MOF during UOR process.
