Preparation and properties of artificial bone with lead-free piezoelectric materials

Ruanbin Wang; Feng Gu; Shuhao Yan; Yonggang Zhao; Li-Qian Cheng

doi:10.54227/mlab.20230005

Article navigation > Materials Lab > 2023 > 2, 230005

Ruanbin Wang, Feng Gu, Shuhao Yan, Yonggang Zhao, Li-Qian Cheng. Preparation and properties of artificial bone with lead-free piezoelectric materials[J]. Materials Lab, 2023, 2(3): 230005. doi: 10.54227/mlab.20230005

Citation:

Ruanbin Wang, Feng Gu, Shuhao Yan, Yonggang Zhao, Li-Qian Cheng. Preparation and properties of artificial bone with lead-free piezoelectric materials[J]. Materials Lab, 2023, 2(3): 230005. doi: 10.54227/mlab.20230005

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Preparation and properties of artificial bone with lead-free piezoelectric materials

More Information

1.
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Corresponding author: chenglq@cumtb.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract

In order to fabricate the artificial bone with high bioactive property, lead-free barium titanate (BaTiO₃, BT) piezoelectric material added hydroxyapatite (HA) composites were prepared in this study. Compared with the pure HA materials, the introduction of BT can increase the electrical properties of the samples while ensuring good biological properties. The electrical properties, such as piezoelectric constant d₃₃, hysteresis loop and dielectric spectrum were measured, respectively. The bending strength, Vickers hardness, cytotoxicity and osteogenic property of the BT/HA composites were also discussed. It is revealed that the non-toxic sample with 95 wt% BT and 5 wt% HA (95BT+5HA) has the best osteoinductivity, the piezoelectric constant d₃₃ of which is 79.2 pC N⁻¹. The bending strength and Vickers hardness of the 95BT+5HA sample are 138.3 MPa and 472.4, respectively, realizing the desired mechanical properties of human bones. Comprehensive analyses of various properties show that the 95BT+5HA composite can meet the requirements of artificial bone, and is expected to be a promising generation of substitute bone materials.
- Artificial bone /
- BaTiO₃ /
- Electrical property /
- Mechanical property /
- Cytotoxicity /
- Osteoinductivity
Information

Received Date: 18 February 2023

Revised Date: 13 March 2023

Accepted Date: 31 March 2023

Available Online: 11 April 2023

Publish Date: 12 October 2023

FullText(HTML)

References

1.	J. Lu, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Yang, X. Zheng and J. Xu, Tissue Eng. Part B, 2022, 28, 35 CrossRef Google Scholar
2.	D. Huten, G. Pasquier and J.-C. Lambotte, Orthop. Traumatol.: Surg. Res., 2021, 107, 102776 CrossRef Google Scholar
3.	R. Lanza, D. W. Russell and A. Nagy, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2019, 19, 723 CrossRef Google Scholar
4.	R. Emadi, F. Tavangarian, S. I. R. Esfahani, A. Sheikhhosseini and M. Kharaziha, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2010, 93, 2679 CrossRef Google Scholar
5.	J. Zhang, Y. Feng, X. Zhou, Y. Shi and L. Wang, Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater., 2021, 70, 37 CrossRef Google Scholar
6.	Z. Xie, M. Gao, A. O. Lobo and T. J. Webster, Polymers, 2020, 12, 1717 CrossRef Google Scholar
7.	C. Cen, Y. Zhang, C. Luo, J. Wu, F. Liu and S. Wu, J. Pract. Orthop., 2019, 25, 326−332, 365 CrossRef Google Scholar
8.	Y. Noyama, T. Nakano, T. Ishimoto, T. Sakai and H. Yoshikawa, Bone, 2013, 52, 659 CrossRef Google Scholar
9.	N. Diomidis, S. Mischler, N. S. More and M. Roy, Acta Biomater., 2012, 8, 852 CrossRef Google Scholar
10.	A. M. Ferreira, P. Gentile, V. Chiono and G. Ciardelli, Acta Biomater., 2012, 8, 3191 CrossRef Google Scholar
11.	C. Hu, B. Qiu, Z. Zhou, Y. Yang and J. Li, Chin. J. Tissue. Eng. Res., 2020, 24, 589 CrossRef Google Scholar
12.	A. Dey, S. K. Nandi, B. Kumar, C. Kumar, P. Mukherjee, S. Roy, A. K. Mukhopadhyay, M. K. Sinha and D. Basu, Ceram. Int., 2011, 37, 1377 CrossRef Google Scholar
13.	F. Scalera, A. Quarta, D. M. Tobaldi R. C. Pullar and C. Piccirillo, Mater. Chem. Front., 2021, 5, 5071 CrossRef Google Scholar
14.	Y.-H Kim, H.-J. Lee, K.-A. Cho, J. Kim, J.-W. Park, S.-Y. Woo and K.-H. Ryu, Tissue Eng. Regener. Med., 2022, 19, 131 CrossRef Google Scholar
15.	M. Alipour, N. Firouzi, Z. Aghazadeh M. Samiei, S. Montazersaheb, A. B. Khoshfetrat and M. Aghazadeh, BMC Biotechnol., 2021, 21, 6 CrossRef Google Scholar
16.	S. Swain, R. N. Padhy and T. R. Rautray, J. Korean Ceram. Soc., 2020, 57, 495−502 CrossRef Google Scholar
17.	C Wu, Y. Tang, K. Zhao, M. Jiao and Z. Wu, Micro Nano Lett., 2020, 15, 421 CrossRef Google Scholar
18.	S. Swain, R. N. Padhy, and T. R. Rautray, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2020, 239, 122002 CrossRef Google Scholar
19.	A. Carter, K. Popowski, K. Cheng, A. Greenbaum, F. S. Ligler and A. Moatti, Bioelectricity, 2021, 3, 255 CrossRef Google Scholar
20.	L. F. George and E. A. Bates, Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 2022, 10, 772230 CrossRef Google Scholar
21.	L. Zhu, Y. Tang, M. Mao, Z. Wu and K. Zhao, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2021, 41, 2775 CrossRef Google Scholar
22.	T. Kocabas, D. Cakir and C. Sevik, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 2021, 33, 115705 CrossRef Google Scholar
23.	B. C. Wu, E. F. Haney, N. Akhoundsadegh, D. Pletzer, M. J. Trimble, A. E. Adriaans, P. H. Nibbering and R. E. Hancock, NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes, 2021, 7, 987 CrossRef Google Scholar
24.	M. Ren, Y. Zhao, Z. He, J. Lin, C. Xu, F. Liu, R. Hu, H. Deng and Y. Wang, BMC Complement. Med. Ther., 2021, 21, 43 CrossRef Google Scholar
25.	M. Parodi, R. Meazza, C. Vitale, G. Pietra, P. Carrega and M. Vitale, Methods Mol. Biol., 2019, 1884, 87 CrossRef Google Scholar
26.	D. Omagari, M. Hayatsu, K. Yamamoto, M. Kobayashi, N. Tsukano, M. Nameta and Y. Mikami, Bone, 2020, 141, 115596 CrossRef Google Scholar
27.	T. Balbaied, A. Hogan and E. Moore, Biosensors, 2020, 10, 95 CrossRef Google Scholar
28.	T. Balbaied and E. Moore, Appl. Sci., 2020, 10, 66 CrossRef Google Scholar
29.	H. Zarkoob, S. Ziaei-Rad, M. Fathi and H. Dadkhah, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2012, 14, B322 CrossRef Google Scholar
30.	T. Bian, H. Zhang and H. Xing, Colloids Surf, Colloids Surf. A, 2020, 602, 124802 CrossRef Google Scholar
31.	Y. Jia, L. Qin, Y. Gong, R. Chen, Y. Yang, W. Yang and K. Cai, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 2020, 109, 804 CrossRef Google Scholar
32.	N. S. D. Vincentis, A Roatta, R. E. Bolmaro and J. W. Signorelli, Mater. Res., 2019, 22, e20180412 CrossRef Google Scholar
33.	A. L. Hong, M. Ispiryan, M. V. Padalkar, B. C. Jones, A. S. Batzdorf, S. S. Shetye, N. Pleshko and C. S. Rajapakse, Bone Rep., 2019, 11, 100213 CrossRef Google Scholar
34.	X. He, F. Han, M. Liu, Z. Yuan, X. Jiang, C. Hu, S. Ren, X, Lei and L. Liu, J. Electron. Mater., 2020, 49, 6643 CrossRef Google Scholar
35.	R. Zafar and N. Gupta, IET Nanodielectr., 2020, 3, 53 CrossRef Google Scholar
36.	Z. Wang, P. Chen, W. Shi, Y. Li, D. Li, L. Zhang, Y. Yan, Y. Wang, H. Peng, Q. Li and G. Liu, J. Electroceram., 2019, 43, 96 CrossRef Google Scholar
37.	D. Singh, A. Dixit and P. S. Dobal, Ferroelectrics, 2021, 573, 63 CrossRef Google Scholar
38.	K. K. Rahangdale and S. Ganguly, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2021, 260, 124114 CrossRef Google Scholar
39.	Y. I. Dzhezherya, W. Xu, S. V. Cherepov, Y. B. Skirta, V. M. Kalita, A. V. Bodnaruk, N. A. Liedienov, A. V. Pashchenko, I. V. Fesych, B. Liu and G. G. Levchenko, Mater. Des., 2021, 197, 109281 CrossRef Google Scholar
40.	H. Roozbahani, M. Alizadeh, S. Ustinov and H. Handroos, J. Biomech., 2020, 114, 110157 CrossRef Google Scholar
41.	N. Jaouedi, F. J. Perales, J. M. Buades, N. Boujnah and M. S. Bouhlel, Sensors, 2020, 20, 4944 CrossRef Google Scholar
42.	B. Kwom and S. Lee, Appl. Sci., 2020, 10, 4849 CrossRef Google Scholar
43.	R. W. Mann, S. Labrash and S. Lozanoff, Hawaii J. Health Soc. Welf., 2020, 79, 202. Google Scholar
44.	E.-M. Chen, L. Sun, G.-P. Xu, X.-F. Zhang, World J. Stem cells, 2020, 12, 339 CrossRef Google Scholar
45.	S. Swetlana, N. Khatavkar and A. K. SSingh, J. Mater. Sci., 2020, 55, 15845 CrossRef Google Scholar
46.	B Hościło and K. L. Molski, Materials, 2020, 13, 4844 CrossRef Google Scholar
47.	R. F. B. D. Souza, F. C. B. D. Souza, A. Thorpe, D. Mantovani, K. C. Popat and Â. M. Moraes, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2020, 143, 619 CrossRef Google Scholar
48.	J. Xu, Y. Rao, X. Wu, J. Jiang, M. Yu, X. Chen and H. Wang, Dent. Mater. J., 2019, 38, 981 CrossRef Google Scholar
49.	Y. Ma, Y. Li, J. Hao, B. Ma, T. Di and H. Dong, Biomed. Mater. Eng., 2019, 30, 23 CrossRef Google Scholar
50.	M. S. Krasnov, A. I. Shaikhaliev, E. V. Korshakov, M. V. Efimenko, P. P. Soloshenkov, T. R. Davidova, N. D. Zvukova, E. S. Sinitskaya, V. P. Yamskova, I. A. Yamskov and V. I. Lozinsky, Bull. Exp. Bio. Med., 2019, 168, 457 CrossRef Google Scholar
51.	H. Jeon, S. Yun, E. Choi, D. Kang, K.-H. Park, D. Kim, S. Jin, J.-H. Shim, W.-S. Yun and J. Park, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2019, 79, 41 CrossRef Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.