Tin sulfide chalcogel derived SnS<sub>x</sub> for CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction

Jingwen Bai; Lijun Yang; Yuanyuan Zhang; Xiaofu Sun; Jian Liu

doi:10.54227/mlab.20220046

Article navigation > Materials Lab > 2023 > 2, 220046

Jingwen Bai, Lijun Yang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xiaofu Sun, Jian Liu. Tin sulfide chalcogel derived SnSx for CO2 electroreduction[J]. Materials Lab, 2023, 2(1): 220046. doi: 10.54227/mlab.20220046

Citation:

Jingwen Bai, Lijun Yang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xiaofu Sun, Jian Liu. Tin sulfide chalcogel derived SnS_x for CO₂ electroreduction[J]. Materials Lab, 2023, 2(1): 220046. doi: 10.54227/mlab.20220046

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Tin sulfide chalcogel derived SnS_x for CO₂ electroreduction

Published as part of the Virtual Special Issue "Mercouri G. Kanatzidis at 65"

More Information

1.
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
2.
Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shandong Energy Institute, Qingdao 266101, China
3.
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, CAS Key Laboratory of Colloid and Interface and Thermodynamics, CAS Research/Education Center for Excellence in Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Corresponding author: liujian@qibebt.ac.cn

†These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Abstract

A new class of aerogels based exclusively on metal chalcogenide frameworks have been developed, opening up a series of novel properties and applications. Further expanding the application of such chalcogels in electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction is of significance for mitigating the rise of atmospheric CO₂ concentration. Herein, the tin sulfide chalcogel was employed as a pre-catalyst for the construction of efficient electrocatalysts for CO₂ reduction. SnS_0.09 and SnS_0.55 supported on carbon cloth (SnS_0.09/CC and SnS_0.55/CC) were obtained with different amounts of sulfur by cyclic voltammetry activation of the tin sulfide chalcogel at different potential intervals. Compared with SnS_0.09/CC, SnS_0.55/CC with higher S contents exhibited a higher formate Faraday efficiency of 93.1% at −1.1 V verse reversible hydrogen electrode, and the partial current density of formate was 28.4 mA/cm². The difference in performance between SnS_0.09/CC and SnS_0.55/CC could be attributed to the varying sulfur contents which could favor the formation of formate.
- Chalcogel /
- Carbon dioxide /
- Electrocatalysis /
- Tin sulfide /
- CV activation
Information

Received Date: 04 July 2022

Revised Date: 03 August 2022

Accepted Date: 03 August 2022

Available Online: 17 August 2022

Publish Date: 30 April 2023

FullText(HTML)

References

1.	S. Bag, P. N. Trikalitis, P. J. Chupas, G. S. Armatas and M. G. Kanatzidis, Science, 2007, 317, 490 CrossRef Google Scholar
2.	S. Bag, I. U. Arachchige and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 3628 CrossRef Google Scholar
3.	S. Bag, A. F. Gaudette, M. E. Bussell and M. G. Kanatzidis, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 217 CrossRef Google Scholar
4.	Y. Oh, S. Bag, C. D. Malliakas and M. G. Kanatzidis, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 2447 CrossRef Google Scholar
5.	K. Polychronopoulou, C. D. Malliakas, J. He and M. G. Kanatzidis, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 3380 CrossRef Google Scholar
6.	S. Chandrasekaran, L. Yao, L. Deng, C. Bowen, Y. Zhang, S. Chen, Z. Lin, F. Peng and P. Zhang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48, 4178 CrossRef Google Scholar
7.	Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Bai, L. Hao, T. Ma and H. Huang, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2021, 448, 214147 CrossRef Google Scholar
8.	K. S. Subrahmanyam, D. Sarma, C. D. Malliakas, K. Polychronopoulou, B. J. Riley, D. A. Pierce, J. Chun and M. G. Kanatzidis, Chem. Mater., 2015, 27, 2619 CrossRef Google Scholar
9.	Y. Shim, R. M. Young, A. P. Douvalis, S. M. Dyar, B. D. Yuhas, T. Bakas, M. R. Wasielewski and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 13371 CrossRef Google Scholar
10.	K. S. Subrahmanyam, C. D. Malliakas, S. M. Islam, D. Sarma, J. Wu and M. G. Kanatzidis, Chem. Mater., 2016, 28, 7744 CrossRef Google Scholar
11.	B. D. Yuhas, C. Prasittichai, J. T. Hupp and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 15854 CrossRef Google Scholar
12.	A. Banerjee, B. D. Yuhas, E. A. Margulies, Y. Zhang, Y. Shim, M. R. Wasielewski and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 2030 CrossRef Google Scholar
13.	M. Shafaei-Fallah, A. Rothenberger, A. P. Katsoulidis, J. He, C. D. Malliakas and M. G. Kanatzidis, Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 4857 CrossRef Google Scholar
14.	K. S. Subrahmanyam, I. Spanopoulos, J. H. Chun, B. J. Riley, P. K. Thallapally, P. N. Trikalitis and M. G. Kanatzidis, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 33389 CrossRef Google Scholar
15.	Z. Hassanzadeh Fard, S. M. Islam and M. G. Kanatzidis, Chem. Mater., 2015, 27, 6189 CrossRef Google Scholar
16.	B. J. Riley, J. Chun, W. Um, W. C. Lepry, J. Matyas, M. J. Olszta, X. Li, K. Polychronopoulou and M. G. Kanatzidis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47, 7540 CrossRef Google Scholar
17.	J. Liu, K. He, W. Wu, T. B. Song and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 2900 CrossRef Google Scholar
18.	B. D. Yuhas, A. L. Smeigh, A. P. Samuel, Y. Shim, S. Bag, A. P. Douvalis, M. R. Wasielewski and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 7252 CrossRef Google Scholar
19.	J. Staszak-Jirkovsky, C. D. Malliakas, P. P. Lopes, N. Danilovic, S. S. Kota, K. C. Chang, B. Genorio, D. Strmcnik, V. R. Stamenkovic, M. G. Kanatzidis and N. M. Markovic, Nat. Mater., 2016, 15, 197 CrossRef Google Scholar
20.	X. Shan, J. Liu, H. Mu, Y. Xiao, B. Mei, W. Liu, G. Lin, Z. Jiang, L. Wen and L. Jiang, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 1659 CrossRef Google Scholar
21.	H. Mu, G. Lin, Y. Zhang, Y. Xiao and J. Liu, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 2021, 623, 126734 CrossRef Google Scholar
22.	G. Wang, J. Chen, Y. Ding, P. Cai, L. Yi, Y. Li, C. Tu, Y. Hou, Z. Wen and L. Dai, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, 50, 4993 CrossRef Google Scholar
23.	Y. Y. Birdja, E. Pérez-Gallent, M. C. Figueiredo, A. J. Göttle, F. Calle-Vallejo and M. T. M. Koper, Nat. Energy, 2019, 4, 732 CrossRef Google Scholar
24.	M. G. Kibria, J. P. Edwards, C. M. Gabardo, C. T. Dinh, A. Seifitokaldani, D. Sinton and E. H. Sargent, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1807166 CrossRef Google Scholar
25.	S. A. Patil, H. T. Bui, S. Hussain, I. Rabani, Y. Seo, J. Jung, N. K. Shrestha, H. Kim and H. Im, Dalton Trans., 2021, 50, 12723 CrossRef Google Scholar
26.	S. A. Patil, N. K. Shrestha, A. I. Inamdar, C. Bathula, J. Jung, H. Im and H. Kim, Int. J. Energy Res., 2022 Google Scholar
27.	S. A. Patil, N. K. Shrestha, S. Hussain, J. Jung, S. W. Lee, C. Bathula, A. N. Kadam, H. Im and H. Kim, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 417, 126105 CrossRef Google Scholar
28.	W. Yu, F. Shu, Y. Huang, F. Yang, Q. Meng, Z. Zou, J. Wang, Z. Zeng, G. Zou and S. Deng, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8, 20677 CrossRef Google Scholar
29.	M. Chen, S. Wan, L. Zhong, D. Liu, H. Yang, C. Li, Z. Huang, C. Liu, J. Chen, H. Pan, D. S. Li, S. Li, Q. Yan and B. Liu, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 26233 CrossRef Google Scholar
30.	A. Zhang, Y. Liang, H. Li, S. Wang, Q. Chang, K. Peng, Z. Geng and J. Zeng, Nano Lett., 2021, 21, 7789 CrossRef Google Scholar
31.	S. Zhao, S. Li, T. Guo, S. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Wu and Y. Chen, Nano-Micro Lett., 2019, 11, 62 CrossRef Google Scholar
32.	F. Wei, T. Wang, X. Jiang, Y. Ai, A. Cui, J. Cui, J. Fu, J. Cheng, L. Lei, Y. Hou and S. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30, 2002092 CrossRef Google Scholar
33.	W. Ni, Y. Gao, Y. Lin, C. Ma, X. Guo, S. Wang and S. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 5212 CrossRef Google Scholar
34.	Z. Wu, H. Wu, W. Cai, Z. Wen, B. Jia, L. Wang, W. Jin and T. Ma, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 12554 CrossRef Google Scholar
35.	Y. J. Ko, J. Y. Kim, W. H. Lee, M. G. Kim, T. Y. Seong, J. Park, Y. Jeong, B. K. Min, W. S. Lee, D. K. Lee and H. S. Oh, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 2205 CrossRef Google Scholar
36.	X. Zhang, M. Jiao, Z. Chen, X. Ma, Z. Wang, N. Wang, X. Zhang and L. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 429, 132145 CrossRef Google Scholar
37.	Z. Chen, X. Zhang, M. Jiao, K. Mou, X. Zhang and L. Liu, Adv. Energy Mater., 2020, 10, 1903664 CrossRef Google Scholar
38.	G. A. El-Nagar, A. M. Mohammad, M. S. El-Deab and B. E. El-Anadouli, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 19766 CrossRef Google Scholar
39.	F. Joo, ChemSusChem, 2008, 1, 805 CrossRef Google Scholar
40.	Q.-L. Zhu and Q. Xu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 478 CrossRef Google Scholar
41.	Q. Gong, P. Ding, M. Xu, X. Zhu, M. Wang, J. Deng, Q. Ma, N. Han, Y. Zhu, J. Lu, Z. Feng, Y. Li, W. Zhou and Y. Li, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 2807 CrossRef Google Scholar
42.	S. Bag and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14951 CrossRef Google Scholar
43.	A. Zhang, R. He, H. Li, Y. Chen, T. Kong, K. Li, H. Ju, J. Zhu, W. Zhu and J. Zeng, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 10954 CrossRef Google Scholar
44.	F. Li, L. Chen, M. Xue, T. Williams, Y. Zhang, D. R. MacFarlane and J. Zhang, Nano Energy, 2017, 31, 270 CrossRef Google Scholar
45.	B. Ni, T. He, J. O. Wang, S. Zhang, C. Ouyang, Y. Long, J. Zhuang and X. Wang, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 2762 CrossRef Google Scholar
46.	X. Zheng, P. De Luna, F. P. García de Arquer, B. Zhang, N. Becknell, M. B. Ross, Y. Li, M. N. Banis, Y. Li, M. Liu, O. Voznyy, C. T. Dinh, T. Zhuang, P. Stadler, Y. Cui, X. Du, P. Yang and E. H. Sargent, Joule, 2017, 1, 794 CrossRef Google Scholar
47.	T. Shinagawa, G. O. Larrazábal, A. J. Martín, F. Krumeich and J. Pérez-Ramírez, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 837 CrossRef Google Scholar
48.	Y. Zhang, L. Hu and W. Han, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 23610 CrossRef Google Scholar
49.	Y. Deng, Y. Huang, D. Ren, A. D. Handoko, Z. W. Seh, P. Hirunsit and B. S. Yeo, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 28572 CrossRef Google Scholar
50.	W. Ma, S. Xie, X. G. Zhang, F. Sun, J. Kang, Z. Jiang, Q. Zhang, D. Y. Wu and Y. Wang, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 892 CrossRef Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.